I have had the TV for about 14 days, so I can evaluate this time so far, but it is an intensive use. It was bought as a monitor for the PC, for this purpose, to be able to write something in Word, write a review here, but at the same time use it to play games from the PC and consoles like the PS5. The choice was also due to the fact that Sony has Dolby Vision. Suitable for a fan of true UHD 4K film, when on that desert and original films in 4K. Also thanks to a guy named FOMO who did a nice review on it and compared it to the Sony BVM-HX310 reference monitor. TV is also getting decent feedback from fans on foreign forums. The TV has a fairly fast response, for example, when switching input np HDMI 4 and then to Netflix, viewing movies. Why Sony then? Why not Samsung, why not Hisense? Samsung does not support Dolby Vision for film. Samsung generally has the characteristic of over-saturated colour rendering, Sony as always delivers a more natural presentation. The Hisense I read there that has some issues, that's not exactly the best way to go. They also had a problem with eARC and or just dropped out of sound when using audio forwarding. There has been some failure rate with TVs like TCL, somewhere AMD graphics cards have a problem. TCL where it impresses is a very interesting HDMI 2.1 solution, but it doesn't give such certainty, more chances of complications and problems. LG just makes OLEDs, so for my purpose unusable, the burn-in is not covered by warranty, as stated by support themselves after consultation. The great thing about this Sony x95L series is that it doesn't suffer from the aforementioned problems, out of the box it is fairly well calibrated and it is up to you whether you slightly adjust something somewhere according to reviews like rtings. The audio forwarding via eARC works great, instantly and on the first try with the older Onkyo AVR system. With the previous TV it wasn't commonplace, what with me having to disconnect HDMI 3 cables and back again and having to do it several times a month. Clear choice, it's just a miniLED, so I'm not likely to destroy it at PC, versus OLED, where according to the rtings test there's still a problem with endurance and burn-in. But Sony has done a great job, o against the old TV, it has a great black rendition, it doesn't matter if I'm watching a 4K movie or playing a game. I just don't see what or where else black should be blacker.
The other reason was that I found I could handle an even bigger monitor, so 65 inches is ideal for a PC (I can't fit a bigger one, it's hard to use as a monitor).
This x95L is unfortunately not even smaller, that's a shame for people who would have enough for a 55 mount somewhere. I originally wanted something under 30kg so I could put it on an older mount that had the ability to position the TV up and down. So it still happened to me, having to redo the bracket, 32,2kg is just a lot. In Windows 11 it detects very well, the 120Hz panel is visible in the nvidia driver, I just manually select it. The only major shortcoming remains that Sony still doesn't have 4x HDMI 2.1 on all ports. For the PS5 console, so far at 60fps it's enough and I have it on HDMI 2.0. For a 4K player as well, but still for the money I would expect this already solved. The Bravia Core service looks interesting, but with 10 credits and paying for a movie, it didn't impress much. Unfortunately I can't write anything about the signal, reception or tuning of the TV program, as I don't own an antenna and I don't watch TV. Features like USB playback works but not enough for me. Just still with this captivation, I miss the playback of the disc with the menu and so it doesn't interest me too much as a fan. Windows 11 show in game mode PC with HDR 3000nit on it is over the top for me, during the day it glows too much, I had to dim the brightness when reading text. Games like Alan Wake 2 natively in 4K (upsaling turned off), Cyberpunk 2077 look awesome.